13:01:35 #startmeeting oVirt Node Weekly Meeting 13:01:35 Meeting started Tue Apr 16 13:01:35 2013 UTC. The chair is mburns. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:01:42 #chair fabiand jboggs rbarry 13:01:42 Current chairs: fabiand jboggs mburns rbarry 13:02:31 #topic agenda 13:02:38 #info feature review 13:02:44 #info release status 13:02:48 #info other topics 13:03:05 * fabiand is here 13:03:39 * jboggs here 13:03:44 * rbarry here 13:03:47 #topic feature review 13:03:51 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Node_3.0_release-management 13:04:59 #topic Universal Image: 13:05:05 #link 13:05:11 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Universal_Image 13:05:20 #info owner: mburns 13:05:27 #info status: devel complete and merged 13:05:59 #topic Node Upgrade tool 13:06:03 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_upgrade_tool 13:06:10 #info owner: jboggs 13:06:29 jboggs: status? 13:06:44 almost complete pending some review 13:08:17 #info status: in review, nearly complete 13:09:13 #topic Software iSCSI root 13:09:19 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_software_iscsi_root 13:09:24 #info owner: jboggs 13:09:36 #info status: devel complete and merged, pending testing 13:10:04 jboggs, could you add a couple of lines to indicate how to do the testing? 13:10:09 i mean how to setup an iscsi tgt ... 13:10:09 sure can 13:10:18 would be nice ... then i'd give it a try .. 13:10:32 just a couple of hints - nothing fancy :) 13:10:32 #action jboggs to update page with testing steps 13:11:50 #topic Puppet Configuration Management 13:11:56 #info no feature page yet 13:12:19 #action rbarry to create puppet configuration feature page and link to release management page 13:12:25 14[[07Features/Urwid TUI14]]4 !10 02http://www.ovirt.org/index.php?diff=8342&oldid=8341&rcid=8551 5* 03Fabiand 5* (-55) 10Minor fixes 13:12:32 #info owner: rbarry 13:12:40 rbarry: status? 13:13:03 95% code complete. Currently testing. 13:13:11 Also: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_Puppet_Plugin 13:13:24 I forgot to link it to release management, though :/ 13:13:38 #info action complete: http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_Puppet_Plugin 13:14:29 14[[07Node 3.0 release-management14]]4 10 02http://www.ovirt.org/index.php?diff=8343&oldid=8340&rcid=8552 5* 03Mburns 5* (+35) 10/* Features */  13:14:34 ok, linked 13:14:56 fabiand: what's the "open" and "partially" for on features? 13:15:22 #info status: 95% code complete, in testing 13:15:33 mburns, I didn't know who took it .. therefor I added open .. 13:15:39 ahh 13:16:03 I just added partially to swap, because you said that there was soe code, but there is also some code to come .. :) 13:16:13 14[[07Node 3.0 release-management14]]4 !10 02http://www.ovirt.org/index.php?diff=8344&oldid=8343&rcid=8553 5* 03Rbarry 5* (+36) 10/* Features */  13:16:17 btw. targeted means that we target to suport f19 .. :) 13:16:34 yep 13:16:44 ok 13:16:54 #topic Swap enhancements 13:17:00 #info no feature page yet 13:17:18 #action mburns to create feature page for swap and link to release management page 13:17:27 #info owner: mburns 13:17:31 #info status: not started 13:17:46 #undo 13:17:46 Removing item from minutes: 13:17:53 #info status: not started, partially designed 13:18:05 #topic TUI Installer 13:18:13 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Urwid_TUI 13:18:15 merged and complete 13:18:20 #owner fabiand 13:18:26 #status: complete and merged 13:18:26 fixing smaller upcoming bugs 13:18:42 #info just bug fixing now 13:19:01 #topic IPv6 support 13:19:04 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_ipv6_support 13:19:09 #info owner jboggs 13:19:19 jboggs: any work done here? 13:19:24 * mburns suspects not yet... 13:19:25 not started yet 13:19:38 #info status: not started yet 13:19:39 backend should still be there just need to link the front 13:20:08 #info likely that backend functionality is mostly intact, just need UI work 13:20:20 #topic Diagnostics Page 13:20:27 #link http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Node_Diagnostic_Page 13:20:31 #owner: rbarry 13:20:41 #status: patches posted, in review 13:20:47 rbarry: anything else on this? 13:21:04 Nothing to add. Just waiting on review to merge. 13:21:18 ok 13:21:35 * fabiand will pick up the word "review" in a second again .. 13:21:45 #topic Compatibility 13:21:59 #info owner: fabiand 13:22:00 mburns, would be nice if we could setup a couple of f19 builders .. 13:22:04 two or so .. 13:22:26 then we can add jenkins jobs etc 13:22:28 fabiand: agreed, you should ping the infra team about setting them up ;-) 13:22:38 right ... 13:22:50 I'm somewhat tending to always poke the same member of the infra team ;) 13:22:57 #action fabiand to ping infra about F19 builders 13:23:04 fabiand: file a ticket 13:23:11 rather than ping directly 13:23:20 is there an infra bz/track? 13:24:00 fabiand: they use fedorahosted.org/ovirt 13:24:04 ah ack 13:24:06 thanks 13:24:20 though the frontpage doesn't really indicate that... 13:25:01 frontpage on fedorahost.org/ovirt that is 13:26:00 ok 13:26:02 fabiand: is there a feature/wiki page for support? 13:26:10 mburns, nope not yet .. 13:26:17 I'll use a tracker bug for it .. 13:26:24 fabiand: ok 13:26:31 as I suppose that quite some bugs will arise from the migration to f19 .. selinux etc 13:26:51 #info fabiand to use tracker bug to note issues with compatibility 13:27:02 mburns, is there a formal process of becoming an infra member for a subproject? 13:27:05 #info targeting F18, F19, CentOS/EL6 13:27:29 fabiand: no idea, i've not been participating in infra team much 13:27:33 except as needed 13:27:34 I'm fine to cope with F18 and F19 but maybe someone else could look at CentOS/EL6? 13:27:52 mburns, right, i'll ask publicly 13:28:14 fabiand: infra needs to work on a formal process, but lack of time isn't helping 13:28:45 rbarry: jboggs: one of you want to take on EL6/CentOS compatibility? 13:28:55 * jboggs doesnt mind 13:29:09 I don't mind either. 13:29:18 excellent 13:29:36 jboggs: how about you take RHEL 13:29:40 rbarry: you take CentOS 13:29:43 ewoud, yeah - somewhat comprehensible 13:29:45 ack 13:30:20 #info jboggs will take lead on making sure new changes work on RHEL 13:30:31 #info rbarry will take lead on making sure they work on CentOS 13:31:27 #topic Release status 13:31:54 #info on target for freeze 02-May 13:32:06 #info and release 31-May 13:32:50 feature discussions cover most of this topic, i think 13:33:11 #topic Patch Reviews 13:33:20 #info need people to start reviewing patches 13:33:28 ah nice thing, mburns :) 13:33:42 #info more than 25 patches currently outstanding in gerrit 13:35:02 #idea everyone reviews at least 2 patches per day (except when immediate critical work comes up) 13:35:09 thoughts? 13:35:32 mburns, sounds good 13:35:40 I'd even say one patch per day .. 13:35:58 I remeber having reviewd a couple of patchs ... but the weren't merged .. 13:36:12 agreed, will start a few per day 13:36:16 let's say 2 for now, and once we get down to a more manageable number, we can change it to 1 per day 13:36:17 Because reviews get lost when a new patchset arrives (due to a rebase e.g.) 13:36:23 ack 13:36:24 yep 13:36:43 Can we also have a daily merge deadline? 13:37:19 #agreed each person to review 2 patches per day to start, then 1 per day when we get to a more manageable number 13:37:30 #info review means both code review and verification 13:37:42 fabiand: what do you mean by daily merge deadline? 13:37:57 Some point where reviewed and verified patches get merged 13:38:42 fabiand: i think we all have merge ability 13:38:47 b/c when reviewed/verified patches hang around in gerrit for some time, and someone rebases them, then all the review/verify flags are dropped .. 13:39:10 right, so every reviewer can merge if there is at least one other reviewer who reviewed/verified the patch? 13:39:18 fabiand: but sure, let's say all patches for the day reviewed by 4PM EDT 13:39:30 and i'll merge then if you want 13:40:10 well, I didn't know that we can all merge patches - I don't think that the deadline isn't that important in that case .. 13:40:13 fabiand: yes, as long as they are not the patch creator 13:40:25 so 2 sets of eyes other than the patch creator 13:40:33 fabiand: i think we all have merge 13:40:34 ack 13:40:49 if not, let me know 13:40:53 yup 13:40:54 i have merge 13:41:06 rbarry: you might not... 13:42:00 not sure if we added you to the right group 13:42:57 * fabiand needs to go .. but will read the bac 13:43:00 k log 13:43:12 that's all i really have for today anyway 13:43:25 mburns: I don't seem to be part of maintainers, so I'm guessing I can't merge 13:43:40 so let's close the meeting, and we can follow up on irc/email if there is more to discuss 13:43:44 #endmeeting