14:01:45 <sbonazzo> #startmeeting oVirt Weekly Sync
14:01:45 <ovirtbot> Meeting started Wed Apr 15 14:01:45 2015 UTC.  The chair is sbonazzo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:01:45 <ovirtbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:01:45 <sbonazzo> #topic Agenda and Roll Call
14:01:45 <sbonazzo> #info infra_ownr|dcaro: Security incident status
14:01:45 <sbonazzo> #info bkp: conferences and workshops
14:01:45 <sbonazzo> #info ydary: Sync future and format change
14:01:46 <sbonazzo> #info sbonazzo: Outages in Jenkins due to no space left on master
14:01:46 <sbonazzo> #info sbonazzo: Blockers review for 3.5.2 GA
14:01:48 <sbonazzo> #info sbonazzo: Packages review for 3.5.2 GA
14:01:48 <sbonazzo> #info sbonazzo: Next week is feature submission deadline: plans for reviewing submitted features
14:01:50 <sbonazzo> #info sbonazzo: Support for JDK 1.8 / Wildfly progress updates / Contingency plan of building Java7 rpms for Fedora 22.
14:01:50 <sbonazzo> #info SvenKieske: review Bug 1156115 - [RFE] don't use dd to copy sparse images in order to save time and bandwith from exportdomain
14:01:56 <sbonazzo> ovirtbot pingall Who's here for oVirt Sync meeting?
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> Who's here for oVirt Sync meeting?
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> a1-away aaviram abonas AbyssOne_ ahadas alinefm alitke alkaplan alonbl apahim apuimedo asadpanda Asmadeus aterribleloss autoditac bazulay bdperkin bitchecker bkorren bkp BlackPanx bobdrad1 brad_mssw bsanford capri_on CAPSLOCK2000 cereal chasmo77 christyp clarkee
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> clouseau cmestreg cnanakos_away Comnenus coreping coxn cpb crobinso crobinso_ cshereme Cybertinus cyclonis d4n13L danken dasjoe dbrandon delhage Dick-Tracy didi dignus djasa dl9pf_ doron_ dougsland dustinm` DV_ dyasny ecohen edong23 eedri emesika engkur evil_steve
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> evilissimo1 ewoud fgeorgalas firemanxbr frolland fromani fsimonce funnel fw G-virt garrett_ gchaplik gergc gklein gotgnu gshereme HK hmpf Hubert ichdasich inetpro infra_ownr|dcaro IOMonster iranzo ishaby itamar j0lly jboggs jbrier jbrooks jhernand jinzo jmh_ro
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> jniederm johnbt jotun jurekr jvandewege kamdard kanagaraj karimb karnan Killsudo killsudo_m KindOne KriP LaercioMotta lagarcia laine Larsen lbianc lveyde lyang0 masayag_ mbetak mehdi___ mikedep333 misc mivaho mlipchuk mmucha Mossel movciari mshira msivak mskrivanek
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> mtayer NoiseDoll Norky novae nsoffer nus NuxRo oliel omachace OnTheRock opuk Orphis_ outi oved Overand overyander ovirtbot pankaj pdangur pgrunt phoracek pixelb pkliczew plustwo primalmotion quaid RameshN ramonn raso Raylaan rbarry rgolan rmatinata rnori RobertM
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> robin5210 Rockybalo rssfed23 rtsq rvalles Rydekull sagarC___ samppah sbonazzo sgordon sgotliv shaharh shaunm Shiva6 shubhendu shug side_control silug singler_ sir_iw sp33t srepetsk sshnaidm straff Svedrin SvenKieske tal Telsin Thalamus tier timbyr tiraboschi_
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> tjelinek tlitovsk tomased tomaw tuxbiker varesa vincent_vdk w0lfeh wgao wicope wojtek1 xnaveira xrsanet YamakasY ybronhei ydary ykaplan yzaspits zeddii zerick Zordrak
14:01:56 <ovirtbot> Who's here for oVirt Sync meeting?
14:02:10 * infra_ownr|dcaro 
14:02:38 <apuimedo> not me
14:02:38 * alitke here
14:02:48 * fromani here
14:03:06 <sbonazzo> #chair infra_ownr|dcaro  alitke fromani
14:03:06 <ovirtbot> Current chairs: alitke fromani infra_ownr|dcaro sbonazzo
14:03:46 <sbonazzo> #topic Security incident status
14:03:50 * tal here
14:04:00 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: do you want to update us?
14:04:14 <sbonazzo> #chair tal
14:04:14 <ovirtbot> Current chairs: alitke fromani infra_ownr|dcaro sbonazzo tal
14:05:07 <sbonazzo> so, from previous discussion with infra_ownr|dcaro:
14:05:16 <infra_ownr|dcaro> sbonazzo: ok
14:05:18 <sbonazzo> #info We did got hacked, a couple of  files where uploaded but no privilege escalation.
14:05:18 <sbonazzo> #info oVirt infra solved the issue though they are still scanning for more security and planning to highly improve the security asap
14:05:18 <sbonazzo> #action oVirt infra to highly improve the security asap
14:05:53 <infra_ownr|dcaro> sbonazzo: yep :)
14:06:01 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: any more info ?
14:07:28 <sbonazzo> ok, let's keep it offline if there are more info available
14:07:37 * lvernia is here.
14:07:41 <sbonazzo> #topic conferences and workshops
14:07:41 <sbonazzo> #info the most important thing is yet-another request for help at Grazer Linux Days in Graz, Austria this weekend
14:07:41 <sbonazzo> #info Rene Koch is seeking backup help manning the booth at that event
14:07:41 <sbonazzo> #link http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-April/032251.html
14:07:41 <sbonazzo> #info All other event and conference news is the same as two weeks ago.
14:07:42 <sbonazzo> #link http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2015/ovirt.2015-04-01-14.02.log.html
14:07:49 <sbonazzo> #chair lvernia
14:07:49 <ovirtbot> Current chairs: alitke fromani infra_ownr|dcaro lvernia sbonazzo tal
14:08:03 <sbonazzo> any other new conference to be noted?
14:09:21 <sbonazzo> ok, if there are any new conference please update offline
14:09:25 <sbonazzo> #topic Sync future and format change
14:09:25 <sbonazzo> #info bkp sent some thoughts to mailing list
14:09:25 <sbonazzo> #link http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-April/032389.html
14:09:40 <sbonazzo> we started the discussion in last meeting
14:09:53 <sbonazzo> but we had no decision yet
14:10:21 <sbonazzo> #link previous meeting logs: http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2015/ovirt.2015-04-08-14.09.log.html
14:10:23 * danken knows not if the approaching kvm-forum deadline was mentioned
14:10:53 <sbonazzo> danken: yes it was: 14:47:04 <bkp> Planning for KVM Forum is up and running. KVM- and oVirt-related talks should be submitted at http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/kvm-forum/program/cfp
14:11:22 <sbonazzo> 14:47:08 <bkp> before May 1.
14:11:58 <sbonazzo> does anybody something to share about the future format change?
14:12:36 <sbonazzo> action item was "Please reply to mail on sync format with ideas on how to change this  meeting's format to something more useful and engaging. Link:  http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-April/032185.html"
14:13:33 <sbonazzo> there was a proposal from misc:14:37:26 <misc> more a office hours, saying to people "if someone ask a question on irc, someone should answer"
14:13:47 <alitke> +1
14:14:40 <sbonazzo> bkp: also said in his email to ml:
14:14:41 <sbonazzo> What I suggest, then, is a series of "office hours," where a rotating set of oVirt team members will commit to being on IRC to answer questions and be generally available. This could be done by one or two people, a few times a week/once a week, and not even a whole hour. Once a schedule is figured out, it would be posted and people would be openly encouraged to participate. This would be an open session on IRC... suppor
14:15:20 <lvernia> sbonazzo: This sounds reasonable.
14:15:31 <fromani> sbonazzo: sounds interesting indeed
14:15:37 <lvernia> sbonazzo: And further discussion could be carried over the mailing list if need be?
14:15:40 <sbonazzo> so let's vote, looks like we have at least 3 +1
14:15:55 <sbonazzo> lvernia: I think so
14:16:01 <sbonazzo> +1 for me too
14:16:03 <lvernia> sbonazzo: As sometimes the "volunteer" would likely not have all the answers...
14:16:13 <sbonazzo> lvernia: I agree
14:16:19 <sbonazzo> let's make it simpler
14:16:26 <sbonazzo> anybody against the proposal?
14:16:41 <tal> I'm in for that, I think that even if the "volunteer" will not know all the answers, he will know who to turn to to get the information needed
14:17:14 <sbonazzo> ok, looks like we have an agreement
14:17:34 <sbonazzo> #agreed on a series of "office hours," where a rotating set of oVirt team members will commit to being on IRC to answer questions and be generally available. This could be done by one or two people, a few times a week/once a week, and not even a whole hour. Once a schedule is figured out, it would be posted and people would be openly encouraged to participate. This would be an open session on IRC... support questions, c
14:18:13 <sbonazzo> #agreed on moving to carry over to the mailing list topics that need to be covered there because the volounteer doesn't have the answers
14:18:20 <sbonazzo> #undo
14:18:20 <ovirtbot> Removing item from minutes: AGREED by sbonazzo at 14:18:13 : on moving to carry over to the mailing list topics that need to be covered there because the volounteer doesn't have the answers
14:18:35 <sbonazzo> #agreed on carrying over to the mailing list topics that need to be covered there because the volounteer doesn't have the answers
14:19:00 <sbonazzo> anything else to be added?
14:20:06 <sbonazzo> I'll take it like a no, let's move on
14:20:11 <sbonazzo> #topic Outages in Jenkins due to no space left on master
14:20:32 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: we had several issues in last few days with jenkins master going out of space
14:20:45 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: anything we can do for preventing it to happen again?
14:22:09 <infra_ownr|dcaro> sbonazzo limit all your jobs history to ~100 tops
14:22:39 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: do we need to change manually all of them? or do we have a global config?
14:24:36 <sbonazzo> #info we had several issues in last few days with jenkins master going out of space
14:24:36 <sbonazzo> #info solution is to limit job history to ~100 tops
14:24:36 <sbonazzo> #action jenkins job owners to review their jobs and fix them if needed
14:24:36 <sbonazzo> #action infra owner to check if a global config may enforce it
14:24:37 <infra_ownr|dcaro> sbonazzo: the yaml ones there's no need, but non-yaml ones must be changed manually
14:24:46 <sbonazzo> #undo
14:24:46 <ovirtbot> Removing item from minutes: ACTION by sbonazzo at 14:24:36 : infra owner to check if a global config may enforce it
14:24:51 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: thanks
14:25:01 <infra_ownr|dcaro> I changed the ones that took most space
14:25:19 <sbonazzo> infra_ownr|dcaro: ok, that should save us for a while
14:25:25 <sbonazzo> let's move on
14:25:31 <sbonazzo> #topic Blockers review for 3.5.2 GA
14:25:51 <sbonazzo> #link oVirt 3.5.z status: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2015-April/010261.html
14:26:12 <sbonazzo> lvernia: news about the network blockers?
14:26:20 <lvernia> sbonazzo: Pffff.
14:26:45 <lvernia> sbonazzo: We're half-clueless. It's not even clear that it's reproducible outside our testing environment.
14:26:52 <sbonazzo> lvernia: I've understood it's affecting mostly ovirt-node and it's not reliably reproducible
14:27:02 <lvernia> sbonazzo: But we're working on it. Me, fabiand, ibarkan and mburman.
14:27:07 <lvernia> sbonazzo: Exactly.
14:27:14 <sbonazzo> lvernia: so maybe not worth to block 3.5.2 GA
14:27:27 <lvernia> sbonazzo: Depends whether GA includes node or not.
14:28:00 <sbonazzo> lvernia: historically node arrives a week or so after GA but uses vdsm from GA
14:28:15 <lvernia> sbonazzo: So this might not necessarily be the case...
14:28:16 <sbonazzo> lvernia: so if the fix is going to be in vdsm maybe an async release will be needed
14:28:23 <lvernia> sbonazzo: That seems likely.
14:28:36 <lvernia> sbonazzo: But sure, I don't mind releasing vdsm first without node.
14:28:48 <lvernia> sbonazzo: We have no indication that this happens on other hypervisor OSs.
14:29:51 <sbonazzo> lvernia: ok, let's see if we discover something before GA date (22 Apr) and let's decide then what to do
14:30:17 <sbonazzo> tal: storage issues?
14:30:20 <lvernia> sbonazzo: Ack.
14:30:50 <tal> No, currently working on our major RFEs
14:30:55 <tal> Updates on those?
14:31:43 <sbonazzo> So i guess we can change topic :-)
14:31:43 <tal> Ceph integration - We gave QE a scratch build and it underwent first pre-integration, we got feedbacks from them, some are irrelevant anymore since more work has been done after the scratch build given to them and some was relevant and we are working on it
14:31:54 <tal> SPM removal - nothing new from last week, work is still in progress
14:32:01 <sbonazzo> #topic Storage updates
14:32:02 <tal> Resize LUN - We had our first meeting with QE, no feedbacks from them yet
14:32:14 <sbonazzo> #info Ceph integration - We gave QE a scratch build and it underwent first pre-integration, we got feedbacks from them, some are irrelevant anymore since more work has been done after the scratch build given to them and some was relevant and we are working on it
14:32:22 <sbonazzo> #info SPM removal - nothing new from last week, work is still in progress
14:32:28 <tal> Those are the major ones, the rest of the RFEs there's nothing to report for now, work is in progress
14:32:33 <sbonazzo> #info Resize LUN - We had our first meeting with QE, no feedbacks from them yet
14:32:41 <sbonazzo> #info the rest of the RFEs there's nothing to report for now, work is in progress
14:32:45 <sbonazzo> tal thanks
14:32:49 <sbonazzo> tal before you leave
14:33:06 <sbonazzo> for 3.5.2 we're going to release an update to qemu-kvm-rhev
14:33:46 <sbonazzo> tal can you confirm if  we want qemu-kvm-rhev-1.5.3-86 here and not qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23
14:33:59 <sbonazzo> mskrivanek: ^^ for virt side too
14:34:10 <sbonazzo> fromani: ^^
14:34:55 <sbonazzo> #topic Packages review for 3.5.2 GA
14:34:56 <tal> sbonazzo: Not sure, I have to do my homework on this one, one thing I do know is that we found a bug with qemu >2 and certain storages
14:35:13 <sbonazzo> tal so likely we'll have 1.5 there
14:35:32 <fromani> sbonazzo: for virt side I'm not aware of any need for qemu-rhev > 1.5, so 1.5 should be good for us
14:35:32 <tal> sbonazzo: All the data is in that bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209034
14:35:35 <sbonazzo> #link candidates to 3.5.2 GA: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2015-April/010259.html
14:35:45 <tal> And the bug that is blocking it, please review before your decision
14:37:24 <sbonazzo> #info qemu-kvm-rhev-1.5.3-86 is best candidate for 3.5.2 GA due to  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209034 related to qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23
14:37:53 <sbonazzo> #action maintainers please review the package list and ensure it's all you expect to be released there
14:38:28 <sbonazzo> #topic Support for JDK 1.8 / Wildfly progress updates / Contingency plan of building Java7 rpms for Fedora 22.
14:38:51 <sbonazzo> #info infra update: Proceeding well with 3.6 items, fence refactoring is almost done, VDSM events work is in progress, host upgrade manager is progressing well both in the host and engine side, and more. We will also start looking at Jboss-widlfly support in a few days, and see how we can proceed with supporting it.
14:39:24 <sbonazzo> so I guess we can postpone this to next week meeting or to mailing list for updates
14:39:48 <sbonazzo> #action infra to follow up on Jboss-widlfly support for 3.6
14:40:24 <sbonazzo> #action integration to check if contingency plan of using jdk7 may work
14:40:47 <sbonazzo> #topic SvenKieske: review Bug 1156115 - [RFE] don't use dd to copy sparse images in order to save time and bandwith from exportdomain
14:40:54 <sbonazzo> SvenKieske: around?
14:41:02 <SvenKieske> yes
14:41:13 <sbonazzo> SvenKieske: looking at the bug looks like you're all set
14:41:16 <SvenKieske> sbonazzo: I already did get a reply
14:41:28 <SvenKieske> sometimes sending a mail helps ;) thanks!
14:41:32 <sbonazzo> SvenKieske: great, so moving on
14:41:45 <sbonazzo> #topic Next week is feature submission deadline: plans for reviewing submitted features
14:42:03 <sbonazzo> so, next week is feature submission deadline
14:42:21 <sbonazzo> how are you with feature pages / bugs and so on? ready for the review?
14:43:21 <sbonazzo> how do we want to review them? sync meeting? every team to plan a session for presenting the features?
14:43:32 <lvernia> ...
14:43:32 <ovirtbot> lvernia: Error: ".." is not a valid command.
14:43:40 <SvenKieske> sbonazzo: I already noticed at least in the google doc are many features pages missing
14:43:54 <SvenKieske> I don't know if they exist in the wiki, didn't bother to search for them yet
14:43:58 <lvernia> Many are not worth a feature page, BZ includes all relevant information.
14:44:14 <lvernia> At least for networking there are more than a couple.
14:44:36 <sbonazzo> lvernia: well, I think that if that's the case, on the feature column there should be something like "minor feature, no feature page needed"
14:44:39 <SvenKieske> afaik release management rules say that for each feature there must be a feature page, but ymmv
14:45:02 <SvenKieske> I can understand if it's too much overhead for small features
14:45:20 <lvernia> I can mark the spread sheet accordingly, not leave anything empty.
14:45:32 <lvernia> Instead be explicit about what doesn't need one, in my opinion.
14:45:36 <sbonazzo> SvenKieske: well, feature page may be the bug itself provided it contains: feature, contingency plan, test case, release notes if it's a really small feature
14:46:44 <sbonazzo> so we're going to take for granted that if a feature is missing the feature page, the bug itself has to be considered as the feature page
14:47:00 <lvernia> Usually such features wouldn't need e.g. a contingency plan.
14:47:08 <lvernia> And test cases will be relatively obvious.
14:47:09 <lvernia> etc.
14:47:20 <lvernia> On the spreadsheet we have anything that's an RFE, not only big features.
14:47:24 <sbonazzo> lvernia: ok. I see there are also features without bz
14:47:34 <lvernia> sbonazzo: That's weird :)
14:47:46 <sbonazzo> #link features spreadsheet: http://goo.gl/9X3G49
14:48:10 <lvernia> Network looks safe :p
14:48:35 <sbonazzo> #info features without a feature page will take the bugzilla page as feature page to be reviewed
14:48:52 <sbonazzo> #info Usually such features wouldn't need e.g. a contingency plan and  test cases will be relatively obvious.
14:49:26 <sbonazzo> #action features owner to ensure all features have at least the bugzilla entry to be reviewed
14:50:07 <sbonazzo> #info submission deadline is April 22th
14:50:40 <sbonazzo> about the review method, sync meeting? team organized meetings?
14:50:52 <sbonazzo> mailing list discussion?
14:51:54 <sbonazzo> If I remember correctly for 3.5 and 3.4 each team organized a presentation of the features
14:52:08 <sbonazzo> in irc / video conf
14:52:09 <lvernia> It varied.
14:52:18 <lvernia> I think bigger features merited their discussions.
14:52:25 <lvernia> But others were only discussed on mailing lists.
14:52:40 <lvernia> In 3.4 I remember we presented vNIC profiles and labels.
14:52:50 <lvernia> But in 3.5 we had no complex features.
14:53:38 <sbonazzo> ok, let's take this to the mailing list, looks like we need more people to decide how to handle
14:54:07 <lvernia> Ack.
14:54:15 <sbonazzo> #action follow up on how to review the proposed features (irc, hangout, ...)
14:54:18 <Mossel> :)
14:54:25 <sbonazzo> #topic Other topics
14:54:49 <sbonazzo> anybody want to discuss about something oVirt related?
14:55:34 <sbonazzo> do you want to report on feature progress for 3.6? we said it can be done by email / newsletter but we still have some time for it in this meeting
14:57:05 <sbonazzo> or we can end the meeting here...
14:58:03 <sbonazzo> going twice
14:59:02 <sbonazzo> ok guys, have a nice week
14:59:06 <sbonazzo> #endmeeting